Now we have another very exciting debate. May I have the slides on? Not that one. It's a stability debate. So we have a debate between Emilio Calvo and Robert Hatchless. Let's see the case. This one, okay, yes, we are on track. Okay, the case is a 24-year-old basketball player with recurrent shoulder instability with 12% glenoborne loss. He is a semi-pro basketball player. He dislocated two times in the last year and he also has multiple subluxations, three or four, between dislocation and cannot play due to the shoulder instability. And the patient wants something to be done. This is the physical exam. It's his left shoulder. The range of motion, it's okay. He's a positive apprehension test. The load and shift test was also positive in the 1990 abduction position. And there's no problem with the calf and pain. These are the images. On the left, you have the regular x-rays. That is nothing very, very rare in the regular x-rays. The MRI shows a heel-sized lesion with bone marrow edema at the posterior superior part of the humeral head. As you can see, a bone lesion on the glenoid in these images. Regarding the 3D CT scan, we calculate the glenoid track. The glenoid diameter was 32. The bone loss was 4 millimeters. So the 83% of the glenoid diameter was 27 minus 4 millimeters. It's wrong, the slide there. But we have a 23 millimeters glenoid track. The heel-sized lesion on the humeral side was 17. So the glenoid track is greater than the heel-sized lesion. So the lesion is on track. So this is the debate. Emilio Calvo will support the Latarje. And Robert Hatzler will support the Bankara plus Rez Plisage. Emilio, please.

shoulder instability

bone marrow edema

glenoid track

Bankart repair

Remplissage