Thank you, Guillermo, good morning, everyone. I have to apologize because after repeated e-mails, I misunderstood the instructions, so I didn't prepare any slides. I thought it was a debate, but this is not a disadvantage because my arguments will be so solid that in spite of not having slides, you will vote for Latter-day, even in America, for this patient, okay? All right, I will provide you some arguments to vote for Latter-day that are clear, clear to be important for the patients. This patient is a basketball player. He's a collision athlete, in spite of overhead elite, and we know, we know from data from Europe that in collision patients, Latter-day obtains better results in terms of recurrence compared to traditional bank repair or compared to bank repair plus Remplisat. This patient is not only a collision athlete, he's an overhead elite, and you know very well the baseball past that he needs to perform playing basketball. There are some concerns about the potential decrease of external rotations in patients with Remplisat, so keep in mind the potential risk of external rotation limitation with Remplisat. This has not been proven with Latter-day. There's no limitation of external rotation with Latter-day. He was a young patient, wasn't he? 24 years old, so his career is supposed to be long in basketball. There are data of good outcomes using Banker plus Remplisat, but we know there's much longer follow-up and more longer data with Latter-day, so in the long run, probably we need to define if Latter-day is worse or better than Banker plus Remplisat, but so far, we have more evidence of Latter-day. How about results? Results of Latter-day have been proven to be clearly good. Probably in the long run, Banker obtains good results, but again, in the long-term follow-up, Latter-day has very good results supporting very well the passage of time, so in the long run, this patient will do very good with the Latter-day. He's an athlete. How about return to sports? We are always very concerned on how fast the patient can return to sport, and if we can't do anything to speed up the process, so if we do a Banker plus Remplisat, we need to wait some time for the patients and the soft tissue to heal, but in Latter-day, especially if we use screws, the union of the bone will be much more solid, so we can return earlier to sports. In fact, there are several papers, and this is a paper by Pietro Millea and Macroventure proving that the return to sports in collision and overhead less used in the Latter-day is very high. It's over 97%, and the same has been proven by Pascal Ballot or as we published recently in the American Journal of Sports Medicine, but let's go back to the specific patient and their imagined analysis. This was a clear on-track lesion, but near off-track, so the bone defense was around 10%, and we know that this is a critical risk factor for recurrence, not only Banker, but also Banker plus Remplisat. We know that if the patient has a vein erosion or a small bony Banker, there is a risk of recurrence even though we use a Banker plus a Remplisat. This has been proven by Pascal Ballot recently in a publication in Arthroscopy. So in summary, there's no doubt. Latter-day is the best indication for this patient comparing to Banker and Remplisat. Thank you very much. Thank you, Emilio. Thank you.

Dr. Emilio

Latter-day

Banker

Remplisat

basketball player