false
OasisLMS
Catalog
AANA19 Shoulder Access Pass
Radiostereometric Analysis of Biceps Tenodesis: Co ...
Radiostereometric Analysis of Biceps Tenodesis: Comparison of the Suprapectoral and Subpectoral Techniques-Dr. Brian Forsythe, M.D.
Back to course
[Please upgrade your browser to play this video content]
Video Transcription
Video Summary
This video discusses a study comparing the arthroscopic superpectoral technique to the mini-open subpectoral technique for biceps tenodesis (treatment for long head biceps tendon pathology). The study evaluated construct stability and tendon lengthening remodeling in both groups and found no significant difference in clinical outcomes or functional outcomes between the two techniques. However, the arthroscopic approach took longer and removed less tendon tissue. The study also observed significant bead migration, indicating construct stability, and significant tendon lengthening at three months post-surgery. This study suggests that tendon elongation occurs regardless of the technique used and does not affect clinical outcomes. Further investigation in suture anchors and button techniques is planned. No credits were mentioned in the video.
Asset Caption
Concurrent Scientific Session II: Shoulder Paper Presentations 5.4.2019
Keywords
arthroscopic superpectoral technique
mini-open subpectoral technique
biceps tenodesis
tendon lengthening remodeling
clinical outcomes
×
Please select your language
1
English