false
OasisLMS
Catalog
2021 Annual Meeting Shoulder Access Pass
Superior Capsular Reconstruction Versus Bridging G ...
Superior Capsular Reconstruction Versus Bridging Graft: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Back to course
[Please upgrade your browser to play this video content]
Video Transcription
Video Summary
The video discusses the topic of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) versus bridging grafting for the treatment of massive irreparable cup tears. The presenter, Yohei Ono from Japan, explains that while partial repair with a graft is commonly performed, Dr. Mihata introduced the idea of SCR, which involves fixing the graft to the glenoid bone. The purpose of the study was to compare the outcomes of SCR and bridging grafting. A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted, with 50 patients randomized and allocated to either procedure. The results showed no significant differences between the groups in terms of clinical outcomes, graft integrity, or acromiohumeral interval. Both procedures improved passive range of motion, and the overall healing rate was approximately 70%. Future research will focus on longer-term outcomes, ideal graft types, better fixation methods, and patient selection. The presenter acknowledges Dr. Mihata's earlier study using autografts, which showed better results. The video concludes by highlighting the need for further research in this area. No specific credits are given in the transcript.
Asset Caption
Dr. Ian Lo
Keywords
superior capsular reconstruction
bridging grafting
massive irreparable cup tears
clinical outcomes
graft integrity
×
Please select your language
1
English